Edit Template

RTK vs PPK: Which GNSS Correction Method is Right for You?

Both RTK and PPK offer centimeter-level accuracy, but they serve different needs and workflows. Understanding the differences will help you choose the right approach for your specific applications.

Real-Time Kinematic (RTK)

RTK provides real-time positioning corrections, delivering centimeter-level accuracy instantly. Corrections are transmitted from reference stations to your receiver via radio, cellular, or internet connections.

• Immediate results in the field
• Requires real-time communication
• Ideal for surveying and construction

Post-Processed Kinematic (PPK)

PPK processes raw GNSS data after collection, applying corrections during post-processing to achieve high accuracy. No real-time communication is required during data collection.

• Process data after collection
• No communication required in field
• Perfect for drone mapping and remote areas

Understanding the Fundamentals

Detailed Comparison

Aspect

RTK

PPK

Processing Time

Real-time

Post-processing required

Communication

Required during collection

Not required in field

Accuracy

1-3 cm horizontal

1-3 cm horizontal

Remote Areas

Limited by coverage

Works anywhere

Field Verification

Immediate

Delayed

Equipment Cost

Higher (communication)

Lower (basic receiver)

Workflow Complexity

Simple

More complex

When to Choose RTK

RTK is ideal for:
Surveying and Layout: When you need immediate positioning for stakeout and verification
Construction: Machine control systems requiring real-time guidance
Interactive Mapping: Applications where immediate feedback is crucial
Quality Control: Instant verification of measurements and positions
Time-Critical Projects: When delays for post-processing aren’t acceptable

RTK Advantages

• Immediate results and field verification
• Simplified workflow with no post-processing
• Real-time quality assurance
• Perfect for interactive applications

RTK Limitations

• Dependent on communication links
• Higher operational costs
• Limited by network coverage
• Vulnerable to communication interruptions

When to Choose PPK

PPK is ideal for:
Drone Mapping: Aerial surveys where post-processing is standard workflow
Remote Areas: Locations without reliable communication infrastructure
Large Area Mapping: Extensive surveys where post-processing is more efficient
Research Projects: Applications requiring detailed analysis of positioning data
Cost-Sensitive Projects: When minimizing operational costs is important

PPK Advantages

• Works in any location
• Lower equipment and operational costs
• Improved data quality through careful processing
• Better handling of challenging conditions

PPK Limitations

• Delayed results requiring post-processing
• More complex workflow
• No immediate field verification
• Requires technical expertise for processing

Hybrid Approaches

Many modern applications benefit from combining both methods:

  • Dual-Mode Receivers: Equipment that can operate in both RTK and PPK modes
  • RTK with PPK Backup: Use RTK for real-time work with PPK processing for verification
  • Hybrid Workflows: RTK for critical real-time tasks, PPK for detailed mapping
  • Progressive Processing: Start with RTK, enhance with PPK post-processing

Making Your Decision

Key Decision Factors:

Choose RTK if you need:
• Immediate positioning results
• Real-time quality control
• Interactive field applications
• Simplified workflows

Choose PPK if you need:
• Remote area capability
• Lower operational costs
• Flexible processing options
• Research-grade accuracy

Need Help Choosing?

Our directory includes providers supporting both RTK and PPK solutions. Browse our list of GNSS correction providers to find the right technology and service for your specific needs.